DFO clarifies relationship with NEB on fisheries protection along pipeline routes

Robin Rowland 

On January 16, Fisheries and Oceans issued a statement "clarifying" its role after signing an agreement with the National Energy Board on fisheries protection along pipeline routes, saying DFO "remains responsible for fisheries protection, including the issuance of Fisheries Act authorizations."

Fisheries and Oceans signed the agreement with the National Energy Board in mid-December.

DFO says there is little difference between its agreement with the NEB and collaborative agreements with the provinces.

Fisheries and Oceans Canada has established a collaborative agreement with the National Energy Board that will help eliminate overlap and duplication during regulatory reviews while maintaining a strong regime to manage threats to fish and fish habitat.

Fisheries and Oceans Canada remains responsible for fisheries protection, including the issuance of Fisheries Act authorizations.

Our collaborative arrangement builds on the decades of training, experience and expertise of NEB biologists in assessing the potential environmental impacts of development projects, including regarding fish and fish habitat.

These arrangements will yield a number of benefits:
• Ensuring regulators focus on the greatest threats to fish and fish habitat;
• Making the best use of available resources; and
• More efficient approval processes.

The Policy and Operational Guidelines that are followed by DFO staff and anyone else involved in these matters are available on Fisheries and Oceans Canada’s website.

The National Energy Board is best placed to deliver regulatory review responsibilities under the Fisheries Act for activities relating to federally regulated energy infrastructure (such as pipelines).

The Memorandum of Understanding between Fisheries and Oceans Canada and the National Energy Board will enable the NEB to:
• Review proponent applications for impacts to fish and fish habitat;
• Assess appropriate measures to avoid and mitigate impacts to fish and fish habitat;
• Include measures to avoid and mitigate impacts as conditions of licences, orders or certificates issued by the NEB; and
• Assess the acceptability of proponent offsetting plans when authorization is required.

Over the years, DFO has established similar arrangements with some Provinces and with Conservation Authorities.
In all cases, the standards for fisheries protection are established by DFO and the Fisheries Act Authorizations continue to be done by DFO.

Recommended Posts

Alberta Alberta Canada construction Danielle Smith Haisla Kitimat Pipelines

Danielle Smith rules out Kitimat for bitumen pipeline: CBC

CBC news reports from the Premier's conference that Alberta Premier Danielle Smith told reporters Thursday that she is not considering Kitimat, B.C., as a port for the proposed oil pipeline to the West Coast as detailed in an agreement with Ottawa. Smith said she's weighing other options for the route, saying 'we're willing to go […]

Robin Rowland 
Business Century Aluminum Emirates Global Aluminum Oklahoma UAE United States

First large aluminum smelter in US since 1980 planned for the Oklahoma

Two companies plan to construct the first primary aluminum plant to be built in the United States in almost 50 years, the companies said on Monday, adding once complete, the smelter in Inola, Oklahoma will be the largest ever primary aluminum production plant in the U.S. When the smelter in Oklahoma is completed by 2030, […]

Robin Rowland 
Kitimat LNG LNG Canada Mitsubishi natural gas Petronas Pipelines Shell

Shell, Mitsubishi seeking buyers for stake in LNG Canada: Energy media reports

The energy media, including Reuters  and Upstream Online  are reporting that both Shell and Mitsubishi are looking to possibly sell off significant portions of their stake in LNG Canada. Petronas, another of the partners in LNG Canada, has already sold off 20 per cent of its stake in the project to a liquified natural gas […]

Robin Rowland 

1 Comment

  1. […] issued a statement yesterday in response to concerns about the MOU, suggesting that the deal with the NEB is similar to previous […]

Comments are closed.