DFO clarifies relationship with NEB on fisheries protection along pipeline routes

Robin Rowland 

On January 16, Fisheries and Oceans issued a statement "clarifying" its role after signing an agreement with the National Energy Board on fisheries protection along pipeline routes, saying DFO "remains responsible for fisheries protection, including the issuance of Fisheries Act authorizations."

Fisheries and Oceans signed the agreement with the National Energy Board in mid-December.

DFO says there is little difference between its agreement with the NEB and collaborative agreements with the provinces.

Fisheries and Oceans Canada has established a collaborative agreement with the National Energy Board that will help eliminate overlap and duplication during regulatory reviews while maintaining a strong regime to manage threats to fish and fish habitat.

Fisheries and Oceans Canada remains responsible for fisheries protection, including the issuance of Fisheries Act authorizations.

Our collaborative arrangement builds on the decades of training, experience and expertise of NEB biologists in assessing the potential environmental impacts of development projects, including regarding fish and fish habitat.

These arrangements will yield a number of benefits:
• Ensuring regulators focus on the greatest threats to fish and fish habitat;
• Making the best use of available resources; and
• More efficient approval processes.

The Policy and Operational Guidelines that are followed by DFO staff and anyone else involved in these matters are available on Fisheries and Oceans Canada’s website.

The National Energy Board is best placed to deliver regulatory review responsibilities under the Fisheries Act for activities relating to federally regulated energy infrastructure (such as pipelines).

The Memorandum of Understanding between Fisheries and Oceans Canada and the National Energy Board will enable the NEB to:
• Review proponent applications for impacts to fish and fish habitat;
• Assess appropriate measures to avoid and mitigate impacts to fish and fish habitat;
• Include measures to avoid and mitigate impacts as conditions of licences, orders or certificates issued by the NEB; and
• Assess the acceptability of proponent offsetting plans when authorization is required.

Over the years, DFO has established similar arrangements with some Provinces and with Conservation Authorities.
In all cases, the standards for fisheries protection are established by DFO and the Fisheries Act Authorizations continue to be done by DFO.

Recommended Posts

air shed District of Kitimat Editors' note Environment & Science LNG

Opinion: Kitimat Council’s Dereliction of Duty, Lawn care is more important than health care

On June 1, 2026, four members of the District of Kitimat Council, Mayor Phil Germuth, Councillors Mario Feldhoff, Edwin Empinado and Graham Pitzel failed in their duty to the residents of Kitimat by voting against participation in the request to join Dawon Creek, Hazelton and Terrace in asking the province to conduct a comprehensive assessment […]

Robin Rowland 
air shed aluminum black carbon smoke Coastal Gas Link Coastal GasLink District of Kitimat Environment & Science Kitimat LNG LNG Canada natural gas pollution Rio Tinto Study

Kitimat is in the midst of an experiment in human health as industry emissions circulate in the valley, advocates say

    On May 27, 2026 at a forum in Kitimat called “What Are the Health Harms of Flaring from LNG?” Kitimat resident and registered nurse Ankur Patel told the audience, “An experiment[is] being done in our community and in ways that we have never seen before. This industry is developed in a way that's […]

Robin Rowland 
Alberta Alberta bitumen Danielle Smith earthquake Kitimat landslide LNG Canada Northern Gateway Pipeline Pipeline MOU Pipelines Prince Rupert salmon Skeena Terrace

Alberta repeats the old dumb pipeline route along the Skeena River

The northern bitumen pipeline wars could be about to begin all over again Documents obtained by CBC News   in the story Alberta considering 3 oil pipeline routes through northern B.C., the documents show show Alberta’s proposed pipeline routes through northern British Columbia. The pipelines would reach ports on the coast, including Prince Rupert and farther […]

Robin Rowland 

1 Comment

  1. […] issued a statement yesterday in response to concerns about the MOU, suggesting that the deal with the NEB is similar to previous […]

Comments are closed.