Enbridge files thousands of pages in document dump reply evidence to Northern Gateway JRP

Robin Rowland 

Enbridge Northern Gateway has filed thousands of pages of "reply evidence" to the Northern Gateway Joint Review panel, responding to questions from the panel, from government participants like DFO, and intervenors.

Enbridge also used the filing to issue a news release saying it is adding $500 million in new safety features for its pipeline plans.

Northern Gateway Pipelines Reply_Evidence_  (summary of filings PDF)

Link to 43 item  reply filing on JRP website.

In the introduction to the summary of the evidence the JRP asks

Should the fact that Northern Gateway does not respond to all points in a particular intervenor’s evidence or to all intervenor evidence be taken as acceptance by
Northern Gateway of any of the positions of intervenors?

To which Enbridge replies:

No. Northern Gateway does not accept any of the intervenor positions that are contrary tothe Application or additional material filed by Northern Gateway. Some of those  positions will be dealt with by Northern Gateway in cross examination and argument rather than reply evidence, and others will simply be left to the JRP to determine on the basis of the filed evidence alone.

Related: Vancouver Sun: Christy Clark toughens pipeline stance as Enbridge announces safety upgrades

 

The reply covers a multitude of topics including

  • Economic Need and the Public Interest
  • Engineering
  • Avalanche Risk and Groundwater Concerns
  • Corrosivity of Diluted Bitumen
  • Improvements Since the Marshall Incident
  • Geotechnical Concerns
  • Geohazards Issues
  • Seismic Design Concerns
  • Recovery of Biophysical and Human Environment from Oil Spills
  • Corrosion, Inspection and Maintenance of Oil Tankers
  • Design and Construction of Oil Tankers
  • Pilotage

In response to numerous questions about the Marshall, Michigan, oil spill, Enbridge repeats what it said in an e-mail to "community leaders" earlier this week and in this morning's news release, saying: "Enbridge has made a number of improvements since the Marshall incident."

As part of the filing Enbridge has also filed an update on its aboriginal engagement program.

There are also detailed and updated reports on the company's plans for the Kitimat valley region.

Recommended Posts

air shed District of Kitimat election Environment & Science Haisla Kitimat LNG Canada Politics & Government

Major projects and local problems put municipalities in jeopardy

    What a difference a couple of days make. There was no jumping for joy at the Kitimat municipal elections all candidates meeting on Thursday, October 1 just two days after the $33 billion expansion Phase 2 of LNG Canada was announced with approval by the federal Major Projects Office and the positive Final […]

Robin Rowland 
Business Coastal Gas Link construction Government of Canada Haisla Kitimat Korea Gas LNG LNG Canada Mark Carney Mitsubishi natural gas PetroChina Petronas Shell Wet’suwet’en

For the record: LNG Canada Phase 2 positive FID news releases pro and con

(Editor's note: I suspended coverage on Northwest Coast Energy News in July as I recovered from a leg injury. Healing is going well. At this time I am resuming limited coverage. So for the record, here are today’s news releases on the announcement of LNG Canada Phase 2.)         On Tuesday, September […]

Robin Rowland 
Kitimat LNG methane pollution

Gas Flaring worldwide reaches record levels: just released World Bank report.

The annual World Bank Global Gas Flaring report for 2026 reveals that global gas flaring rose for the third consecutive year in 2025, reaching 167 billion cubic meters (bcm), the highest recorded level since 2019. The gas wastefully burned could have powered homes and industries, created jobs, reduced import bills, and extended electricity access and […]

Robin Rowland